|
Post by Alpha Lima Echo Xray on Jul 5, 2006 18:37:30 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by runnerdi7 on Jul 5, 2006 18:51:27 GMT -5
cept the results are fast for 2 reasons, 1) the clock was 20 secs fast 2) its completely downhill
|
|
|
Post by José Newell on Jul 5, 2006 19:22:49 GMT -5
you can actually see how downhill it is.
|
|
|
Post by flint on Jul 5, 2006 21:07:27 GMT -5
Is the 4th place person the Jim Robinson I'm thinking of?
|
|
|
Post by Alpha Lima Echo Xray on Jul 5, 2006 21:21:08 GMT -5
shuuuttttuppp, i was frickin proud man, i shall kill you all
|
|
|
Post by Soprano on Jul 5, 2006 23:14:29 GMT -5
Wait, so the winning time was really 4:30???
|
|
|
Post by The Wise One on Jul 6, 2006 0:53:58 GMT -5
i wouldnt expect much faster at this point of the year, even out of the berube's on a downhill course...
man, brian teague ran 4:40, haha...he hasnt run that fast in like 30 years.
|
|
|
Post by Alpha Lima Echo Xray on Jul 6, 2006 16:15:22 GMT -5
yea i took him out in the last 400m about. and the winning time was gabler or something with 4:10
|
|
|
Post by Soprano on Jul 6, 2006 18:48:02 GMT -5
Wait, so was the clock 20 seconds fast like Sean said or no???
|
|
|
Post by runnerdi7 on Jul 6, 2006 19:43:43 GMT -5
the clock was 23secs fast teague had his own watch on and clocked himself at just over 5min. there was no official race clock so the messed up
|
|
|
Post by Soprano on Jul 6, 2006 20:35:48 GMT -5
Oh ok, gotcha. So Gabler probably ran 4:30 then.
|
|
|
Post by Alpha Lima Echo Xray on Jul 6, 2006 21:37:23 GMT -5
oh fu. i ran 4:29! i heard someone yell 4:30 right after i went across, so they knew
|
|
|
Post by Barber on Jul 10, 2006 11:43:16 GMT -5
trying to hold onto your pride alex?
|
|
|
Post by The Wise One on Jul 10, 2006 17:38:54 GMT -5
yeah man its illogical that you ran 4:29, then 74+ at boilermaker like a week later.
still, 4:52 is a pretty solid time.
|
|
|
Post by Alpha Lima Echo Xray on Jul 10, 2006 20:16:29 GMT -5
stfu it was 4:29, ill cut you
and barber....its the only thing i have left from track!!!!
|
|